An active emotion

Tariq Ali speaks at International Week
Tariq Ali gave the I-Week keynote address on Jan 30.

Sometimes I get so wrapped up in the incredible stuff I’m part of that I don’t even have time to talk about it. This week is the culmination of many months’ work preparing for International Week at the U of A. After all the late nights, tears, and days spent making so many phone calls my phone died mid-afternoon, it’s actually all coming together swimmingly.

It’s funny being inside an event like this. It’s so big, with dozens of workshops sprawled across the week, that it’s impossible to take it all in. So I just get to catch little glimpses of sessions every day, and then see glimmers of the conversations that start churning afterwards. It’s gratifying to see people leaning against a wall debating what good governance really means in sub-Saharan Africa.

Tariq Ali’s keynote lecture on Monday wasn’t what I expected it to be. He’s a British-Pakistani journalist, historian, and filmmaker (and novelist, interestingly). He’s pretty well-known for his sharp writing in places like the Guardian, cutting Western governments to pieces for launching imperialist adventures. But his talk was less anchored to any specific political moments than I thought it would be.

Essentially, he laid out a map of the economic, ecological and political crises we’re all fairly familiar with. An economy divorced from any sensible idea of how to use it to make ecosystems healthier, chugging away on speculation upon speculation on the “fictitious commodity” of money (a term borrowed from our social theory friend Karl Polanyi). And of course a world run not by citizens, but by corporations and governments that pay lip service to our wishes through semi-regular rituals like elections.

“Hope is a very active emotion,” he said, though. “If you hope for something, it makes you active. In the struggle between despair and hope, I have all my life been on the side of hope. And I still am.”

Ali left with some observations about the frustration that leaves our generation with, feeling like we have no real choices except to vascillate occasionally between political masters who basically agree on the fundamentals of how markets and states should work. We are desperate for someone to answer our pleas when we take to the streets, he says, but there is no one out there to save us. It’s just us.

Sankofa by ~Drawn2theMoon
Sankofa (by ~Drawn2theMoon)

It seems like a bit of a nihilistic idea, but I think it’s also an empowering one. Anishinaabe activist and author Winona LaDuke brought up some similar ideas in her talk Monday night. She talked a lot about people on her reserve combatting the big energy issues by looking small, and trying to become more self-sufficient energy-wise through building small wind and solar projects on their land. Working with what they have. She also told stories about people working to heal their histories by going back and planting the seeds their ancestors did, and reclaiming the relationships they used to have taking care of the fish in their rivers. The stories said to me, whatever you lost, go back and get it.

There’s a Ghanaian proverb/symbol that says a similar thing: sankofa. It’s an Akan symbol that means — sort of — go back and get it. Reclaim what you lost.

There’s no one who can do that except us. If you can come to the rest of I-Week, running til February 3rd, I think you might pick up some great ideas on how to start.

A threat to our dangerous genius

If you went in through the front door of WordPress today, you might have noticed this cheerful sight:

An image of WordPress' front page. Where blog recommendations are usually shown, images and text are blacked out behind the words "CENSORED."

It’s a symbol of a protest many sites like WordPress, Reddit, Wikipedia, and even The Oatmeal are going through today to protest two laws being considered in the US Congress – PIPA and SOPA. Both would grant unprecedented powers to copyright owners to tell the US government to block sites they accuse of stealing their content, with almost no oversight. Sites like this one, where people regularly post original or modified copyrighted material, would be forced to maintain constant vigilance over all of their users or risk being shut down.

I love gifs of Doctor Who scenes and watching TV online as much as anyone else, but we all know being able to freely share information is about more than that. We live in a culture now where building, remixing, and adding to one another’s work online is a key part of how we process and share information. The debacle over same-sex marriage rights in Canada last week shows that this power allows misinformation to spread like wildfire, but these bills would restrict our platforms to even have those debates. This is a free speech issue for Americans, but it also matters for the rest of the world because the dangerous genius of the internet is that it allows ongoing global projects and conversations.

What I hope is that the backlash today leads to some deeper conversations about what we do want the internet to look like. There are some important issues coming down the pipeline, so the speak. Should internet service providers be able to create a two-tiered internet, where companies like Bell can charge extra to allow fast downloads of content from the media they own, and slow down access to the rest of the internet? How can we encourage people to make new intellectual work without smothering the public’s ability to benefit from it with lawsuit-baiting copyright laws?

I don’t know what action to recommend except to suggest you read this more in-depth (and very accessible) rundown on Gizmodo today. And help start these next conversations.